Skip to main content

Topic Proposal

1.) Applying for Iowa state residency for tuition purposes at the University of Iowa was changed for the 2018-2019 school year to make it harder for incoming freshman to receive instate tuition. It is clear that the University of Iowa changed the requirements to discourage out of state students from applying for state residency, costing the school money. The new requirements are negative and harmful to the students overall college experience. New requirements are working 30 plus hours a week, limited to 6 semester hours, and so much more. These requirements are hard to obtain, working so much and not being able to take as much classes creates a focus on work and not school. In turn, not much time is left for extracurriculars leading a student to feel disconnected from the student body.
2.) I intend to create a better alternative to applying for instate tuition that is better for the student in terms of stress and campus involvement, in addition to helping the University of Iowa's budgeting issues
3.) I chose this topic because I applied for Iowa residency last year, and the program before all of the changes was the most stressful experience of my life. In addition to this, I was unable to make many friends my first year outside of my job due to time, making it hard to have a good college experience.
4.) Resources
-The University of Iowa Residency Office/Web page
- Personal testimonial
- testimonials of others
- Midwest exchange website

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IMRad Intro and Methods

Introduction In social psychology has established effective compliance techniques such as the foot-in-the-door phenomenon. This strategy states simply that, “ agreeing to a small request increases the likelihood of agreeing to a second, larger request”(McLeod, pp4, 2014). The original experiment on the foot-in-the-door phenomenon was done by Freedman and Fraser in 1966. In the original study, the prediction was that if a small request was asked first and the person agrees to the smaller request, the person is more likely to agree to a larger request after. This prediction was supported in their data which showed that, “Over 50% of the subjects in the Performance condition agreed to the larger request, while less than 25% of the One-Contact condition agreed to it. Thus it appears that obtaining compliance with a small request does tend to increase subsequent compliance” (Freedman and Fraser, 198, 1966).  This is important because this significant data supports that the foot-in...