Skip to main content

Rhetoric Sample Paper Reviews

-The role of writing in political science
1. internal citations
2. organization
3. good conclusion

1. between paragraph transitions
2. word choice
3. repetition

-Writing in Psychology
1. the purpose is strong
2. introduction
3. tone

1. Reference page done incorrectly
2. using quotes
3. organization

-Writing as a Creative Writer
1. organization
2. easy to read
3. reference page done correctly

1. short paragraphs need more support
2. repetition
3. between paragraph transitions

-Writing in the field of Economics
1. introduction
2. references
3. word choice

1. the organization was unclear
2. quotes could have been used in shorter ways
3. repetition

-Writing in the field of Engineering
1. reference page
2. internal citations
3. front page

1. paragraphs are long
2. conclusion
3. starts the paper with no lead up to the quote

-Writing in the business discipline 
1. organization
2. internal citations
3. introduction paragraph

1. blurry graphic
2. resource page, too few sources
3. conlcusion

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Topic proposal

My research topic is exploring the effectiveness of persuasion techniques commonly found in social psychology such as "foot-in-the door" and"door-in-the-face" phenomenons. These are important because they are commonly taught compliance techniques and have been heavily studied in my field of psychology. I have a few research questions I can dive into with these compliance strategies. One is, do these strategies and which strategies work better than no strategy at all? Do certain strategies work better on specific genders? Finally, which strategy is most effective of the ones used in the experiment? I plan on conducting an experiment maybe even more than one experiment to test my hypothesis. My hypothesis is that the foot-in-the-door technique works better than chance, and better than the "door-in-the-face" phenomenon. The independent variable is the strategy used and the dependent variable is compliance. One group will be the control group with no strat...